CHAPTER 12
DEPARTMENT OF SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH
12.1 Wasteful expenditure
The entire expenditure of Rs one crore incurred out of the
funds of the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research remained wasteful
as the objective of the project for development and establishment of pilot scale
production of piezoelectric ceramic filters and resonators for use in electronic
receiving equipment could not be achieved.
The Standing Finance Committee (SFC) of the Department of
Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR) in March 1995 approved a project for
development and establishment of pilot scale production of piezoelectric ceramic
filters and resonators for use in electronic receiving equipment at a cost of Rs
128 lakh. The project was to be implemented by Central Electronics Limited (CEL)
over a period of two years i.e. by March 1997. The contribution of DSIR to the
project was Rs one crore including Rs 10 lakh for equipment for encapsulation
and final testing.
The project aimed at the production of filters and resonators
in a commercially viable manner. CEL in its proposal had pointed out that
piezoelectric ceramic filters and resonators had a high market demand in the
country, which was being met through imports. After satisfactory development of
the products, it would be possible to supply the components at prices
competitive to the cost of the imported components. The commercial production of
filters and resonators involved manufacturing of piezo-electric filters and
resonators, testing and standardising of the components and encapsulating it
suitably.
DSIR released Rs one crore for the project as grant-in-aid
during the period March 1995 to February 1997. In December 1996, the Monitoring
Committee (MC) suggested that production-cost analysis be carried out and
suitable equipment/technology be adopted for volume production for a competitive
product price. CEL was advised to identify and procure the encapsulating
material required for completion of the project and for identification of mass
production equipment. The project was also extended up to December 1997. No
production - cost analysis was carried out by CEL. In the MC meeting of August
1997, CEL expressed its difficulty in procurement of encapsulating material for
the product.
In December 1997, CEL formally closed the project without
setting up the line for pilot scale production of the component even though it
was stated in the completion report that material/component was developed
successfully and that the process for producing piezoelectric chips had been
standardised. CEL attributed its inability to pack the chips for want of
encapsulation equipment/material. CEL stated that no agency/supplier was willing
to supply the encapsulating equipment alone. However, the entire grant of Rs one
crore including Rs 10 lakh meant for encapsulation equipment and final testing
was spent by CEL.
In February 1999, during final evaluation of the project, CEL
expressed its inability before Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to set up a
pilot level production for want of encapsulating equipment. No further action
was taken in this regard by CEL. Thus pilot scale production of piezoelectric
ceramic filers and resonators could not be achieved despite development and
standardisation of material component parts.
In response, DSIR stated in August 2000 that pilot production
of these components could not be taken up for want of viable encapsulating
equipment. Further, due to liberalisation, cheaper imports were available in the
market. The reply has to be viewed in the light of the facts that encapsulation
was an essential part of the commercialisation process, hence the reply begs the
question how the project was cleared without ensuring this essentiality. Efforts
towards procurement of suitable packing material were made only after the MC
pointed it out in December 1996, a year before the scheduled completion of the
project. Further, when efforts at encapsulation failed, no initiative was taken
by CEL to develop the equipment on its own as suggested by the MC. The
contention that cheaper imports are available due to liberalisation rendering
the project unviable apparently is an after thought since liberalised import
policy regime was already in place when the project was taken up in March 1995.
The fact is that the investment decision was taken without due diligence and
considering all the emerging factors. No techno-economic feasibility study was
also done before launching the project. This was a case of faulty investment by
DSIR.
DSIR stated (September 2001) that CEL was now in a position
to commercialise the technology and set up the production facility provided that
the encapsulating equipment was procured or developed in India. However, the
contention of DSIR has to be viewed in the context of availability of cheaper
imports in the market as they have themselves pointed out. Moreover, the
objective of productionising ceramic filters and resonators on pilot scale has
remained unfruitful.
|